Assignments Breakout Session
A loose collection of preparatory notes for an assignments breakout discussion
Attendees confirmed thus far
Attendee |
Institution |
---|---|
Lance Speelmon |
IU |
Oliver Heyer |
UC Berkeley |
Zhen Qian |
UMich |
Clay Fenlason |
Georgia Tech |
Carl Hall |
Georgia Tech |
Stuart Freeman |
Georgia Tech |
Ian Boston |
Cambridge University |
John Norman |
Cambridge University |
John Leasia |
UMich |
Kirk Alexander |
UC Davis |
High-level topics
- Outstanding issues with the post-2.4 assignments branch (and fixing critical ones by January)
- Assignments2 (RSF refactoring of assignments, being pursued by IU)
- Mneme (will include assignments functionality by mid-2008)
- Clarify and publicize to the community:
- which "Assignments" they should be using in their 2.4 deployments and which should be avoided and why. (2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.x, post-2.4)
- what the various Assignments roadmaps are for the future (Assignments, Assignments2, Mneme)
Notes/position papers
- IU design meeting notes for Assignments2
- Georgia Tech priorities
- Turnitin screen capture illustrative of the kind of thing Cambridge University is interested in.
- UCB Priorities