2012-08-21 Meeting Notes

Samigo Working Group
Meeting Information
Day/Time:  Biweekly, Tuesdays  11am PT  / Noon MT / 2-3 ET / 18:00 UCT
Phone number: (317) 278-7008 Access Code: 484896#
Titanpad notes: http://titanpad.com/samigo
Adobe Connect Room (for screen sharing when needed):  http://breeze.iu.edu/samigo
Sign In:
  • Lynn Ward, Indiana University
  • Andrea Schmidt, Indiana University
  • Chris Kretler, University of Michigan
  • Neal Caidin, Sakai Foundation, CLE Community Coordinator
  • Joni Miller, Seminole State College of Florida
  • Ying Wang, Indiana University
  • Jim Mezzanotte, rSmart
  • Luke Fernandez, Weber State U.
  • Jamie T
  • Stanford GSB
  • Mike Jennings
Agenda:
  • Taking a Secure Test w/ Outside Sites (Student Perspective)
  • Review Jackie's designs.
Meeting Notes
  • Luke:
  • NEH funded; originally applied for a NEH grant a year ago; 
  • Elevator pitch: subscribes to Educause listserv; post to listserv about technical solutions to prevent students from being dstracted.  CIO responses were averse to doing that sort of thing; CIO saw mission as providing more connectivity, not less; that was the end of the discussion on the CIO listserv; 150 yearsago Thoreau was able to move off the grid and onto Walden pond where he could think;  building a cabin where students can think; decided to look for a digital solution--think of testing centers as concentration labs.  Give students no access during tests or exercises or give limited access. Project ended last spring and they are writing up the results.
  • Findings were:
  • the tool worked effectively in terms of helping students to reflect
  • not all students liked going to the lab to do their work
  • a catalyst to get students to think about the problem of digital distractions
  • still using the browser now
  • helps to standardize the tools made available through the testing center 
  • In conversations that Luke has had with Keli, it seems that users are looking for ways to do more secure testing
  • Keli: even though the original focus was helping students concentrate, this application has potential for secure testing.
  • Ken Romeo: gives a writing test where they do want to lock down the browser; nothing to prevent student from opening another browser; any system that doesn't save the data to the desktop is subject to network errors.
  • GSB has just starting to think about Online testing; trying to catch up and to see what others are doing
  • GSB: one of their biggest concerns is performance; have there been  some bugs with the locked down browser; mostly have been resolved.  Mitigated most problems by caching the data locally.
  • If you hit CTRL-ALT-Delete, you get the control panel  where you can access another app; secure browser just helps to facilitate secure test taking.
  • Respondus Lockdown Browser locks you out of all other apps.  You can define a whitelist (apps that can run while the Respondus LDB is running). They make a custom exe file for your institution.
  • At GSB, exams are proctorless and students use their own computers.  At Weber State, they are using proctors.  Proctors are probably needed with the Concentration Browser.
  • Another approach would be setting up a testing center.  Still a proctor would be useful.
  • Keli liked the idea of being able to whitelist sites for specifc tests.
  • JIm: Respondus does allow you to include links in a test, and user can go to that one site or page.