2011-08-23 Meeting Notes

Owned by Former user (Deleted)
Last updated: Aug 31, 2011Version comment
2 min read

Samigo Working Group Meeting Notes
Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Time:   11am PDT  / Noon MDT / 2-3 EDT / 18:00 UCT
Phone number: (317) 278-7008 Access Code: 484896#
Meeting Prep Documents

  • https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/Samigo+Working+Group+Member+List
  • https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/Top+3+Samigo+Priorities+%28Short-+and+Long-Term%29
    Agenda
  • Additions to Agenda 
  • Summary of  on list discussions 
  • email options 
  • Schedule integration 
  • Testing strategy for 2.9, who can coordinate, who's can be involved
  • Other 2.9 questions, concerns? 
    Attendance:
  • Megan May - Indiana University
  • Andrea Schmidt - Indiana Univerity 
  • Ying Wang - Indiana Univeristy 
  • Roger Henry Indiana Unveristy 
  • Bryan Holladay - Longsight
  • Sam Ottenhoff  - Longsight 
  • Lydia Li - Stanford
  • Keli Amann - Stanford
  • Jackie Krueger - Stanford
  • Karen Tsao - Stanford
  • Ken Romeo - Stanford
  • Makoto Tsuchitani - Stanford
    Meeting Notes:
    email options
  • Sam gave feedback.    Mailto would be a feasible option for now.    
  • SAK-1130 is in trunk.  
    Schedule Integration (https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-1121)  
  • Rather than having the three dates; suggested to just have the due date
  • Move the checkboxes to the confirmation page.  Ensure a published test updates the calendar event when changed   
  • Code pulls in institutional branding for calendar name. 
    SAM-1313
    * Stanford thinks this is related to https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-812 
    New Survey Quesiton Type 
  • SAM-???
  • Need help with formatting of questions 
  • S. will email Sam.  
    2.9 Testing  
  • Stanfords process overview 
  • 1 QA resource (Jasmine).  Local QA 
  • Verify bugs (ones assigned to Jasmine) 
  • IU has a similar prokcess 
  • Others have helped in the past but haven't 
    - Verify bugs (ones assigned to Jasmine) 
    - Should we have a plan 
    There are test cases for 2.7.    
     Stanford Testing
    * Verifies JIRA bugs
    * They have test cases to follow.   
    Agile Methodologies Going Forward 
  • Would like to pursue this as a development model 
  • The schedule and the tabs  . . . were good examples of this.   
  • For 2.10 go through backlog and get votes on what to work on.   
  • Post some ideas at https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/SAMigo+2.10 
    Topics for next Meeting (Sept 6th) 
  • Revist 2.9 QA resources 
  • Start talking about things we're working on, ideas going forward for 2.10.   IU will have information to share.  
    Action Items
    * Send out message about 2.10 Planning (Stanford)
    * All - post items you are interested in working onÂ