rA11y Plan
- 1
- 2 RA11y Plan (Review Accessibility Plan)
- 2.1 Phased Plan
- 3 Timeline
- 4 Issues Identified
- 4.1 Full List
- 5 Updates
- 5.1 Early Fall 2015 Update
- 5.2 Summer 2015 Update 2
- 5.3 Summer 2015 Update
- 5.4 March 2015 Update
- 5.5 Spring 2016 / Open Apereo Con 2016
- 5.6 July 2016
- 5.7 August 2016
- 5.8 June 2017
- 5.9 October 2017
- 5.10 August 2018
RA11y Plan (Review Accessibility Plan)
The RA11Y Plan (Review Accessibility Plan) is an initiative by the Sakai Accessibility Working Group to commission a substantive review of Sakai’s accessibility by an NFB-like group with a goal of obtaining a certification, including a VPAT and WCAG2-based review, that would assure potential adopters and current users alike. Sakai has a good history of accessibility but resources are limited and new developments in Sakai need to be reviewed and brought up to standard.
Some institutions have already contributed funds. More is needed and community input about priorities is welcome.
Our goal is US$61,000 as this matches some of the quotes we’ve received for the review and some assumptions made about the work that needs to be done in response to the review.
Phased Plan
Timeline updated November 9, 2017
| 2. Fix and Enhance | 3. Comprehensive Review for VPAT & WCAG2 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
As items are identified and resolved issues and tools will move through parts one and two. All parts will need resources. Areas of Sakai might move through phases one and two at different paces, but they should culminate in phase three together.
As the Longsight partial audit is incorporated, a revised list of unreviewed areas of Sakai can be generated, prioritized based on the 2014 tool use survey and the scope of a complementary partial review can be identified. Based on the prioritized list, the new partial review project cost can estimated and the estimate used to seek contributions.
The partial review will no doubt identify issues that need resolution before a full review and accessibility statement can be sought. Additional contributions responding to these issues will be needed. Contributions would include modifying components directly or contributing funds to support work by commercial partners.
A recording of the update webinar can be found on YouTube.
Timeline
Short term, Winter 2015
Incorporate outstanding issues from 2013 Longsight partial audit into JIRA2 (in progress, LSNBLDR-456 already addressed!) and relate issues in JIRA to Longsight partial audit.
Update identified list of unreviewed areas of Sakai.Sakai 11 developments will be accounted for and the list will also be prioritized based on the 2014 tool use survey and the scope.
Medium term, Winter 2015 ~ Summer 2015
Encourage work on identified issues from the short term.
Fundraise for partial accessibility audit and remaining issues in Sakai.
Commission partial audit of Sakai.
Identify the scope and resources required for identified work.
Encourage work on newly identified issues.
Long term, After Completion of Phases 1 and 2.
Phases 1 - Fall and Winter of 2015
Verify that Sakai is ready to be reviewed and seek an accessibility statement
Create a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) as a self study before submission for a full review and interim certification.
Agree on a reviewer like the National Federation of the Blind (NFB) or a similar established commercial reviewer.
Fundraise for full review
Phase 2 - Summer and Winter 2016
Commission full review
Work to address idenfited issues
Outcome
Verification or conditional statement of accessibility from a reviewer like NFB and confirmed or conditional WCAG 2 Level AA status for Sakai.
1 VPAT - Voluntary Product Accessibility Template - {+}http://www.state.gov/m/irm/impact/126343.htm+
2 Sakai Jira - {+}https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse+
Issues Identified
453 instances have been consolidated to 51 JIRA-issues, listed below or searchable in Sakai's JIRA.
Some trends of key issues have been identified:
SAK-31549 Ensure screen reader specific content is rendered off-screen rather than hidden or not displayed.
SAK-31617 Throughout Sakai 11 there are colours that do not have a high enough ratio.
SAM-2217 Identifies that there needs to be a valid label for form fields throughout the delivered assessments in Tests and Quizzes. This is a JavaServer Faces (JSF) related issue, and would benefit from Java developer's attention.
There were a number of issues associated with the Signup tool