Incorporated
Details
Priority
CriticalAffects versions
Components
Assignee
SAMIGO TEAMSAMIGO TEAMReporter
Leonardo CanessaLeonardo CanessaLabels
Details
Details
Priority
Affects versions
Components
Assignee
SAMIGO TEAM
SAMIGO TEAMReporter
Leonardo Canessa
Leonardo CanessaLabels
Created June 14, 2016 at 9:04 AM
Updated April 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
Resolved November 22, 2016 at 8:27 PM
Within the original extended time code, it was possible for the following situation to occur:
Here is an example from PublishedMetadata database entries:
ASSESSMENTMETADATAID
ASSESSMENTID
LABEL
ENTRY
2694
624
extendedTime3
(null)
2722
624
extendedTime3
2c7f87e6-360a-4383-8dea-b452013bbc69\
1560\
05/17/2016 11:35 am\
05/17/2018 11:35 am\
05/17/2018 11:35 am
AssessmentID and Label should be a unique pair.
This occurred on 11.x based on 7eb73319d75. It also occurred locally on our original extendedTime code.
This is not a good situation. Extended time data is retrieved using the
getAssessmentMetaDataByLabel
method. As there are two labels for the same AssessmentID it's a toss up on which entry would be retrieved. This can result in odd behavior (entries showing up in the UI, refreshing, and then not being present); this behavior is what was experienced in the original 2.9 implementation.To resolve this, I've refactored how extendedTime entries are saved.