Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Relates to a number of issues SAK-22210, SAM-2369 but xalan doesn't appear to be used in jsf and the version in rwiki is old because we were extending a class that's not final. Wrapping that class appears to work out fine and gets those libraries updated for rwiki.
I'm sorry. I've seen the comments, but I don't understand what they imply. I thought r311469 was a Subversion style revision id? But the fix version shows 11 (git) and not 10 (subversion). Basically all I am really asking is if the fix version is correct (11) and if the 10 status merge flag should be set or not (or set to resolved if it is already merged into 10.x)?
Sam Ottenhoff December 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM
Check my comment from 25-Nov-2014 10:03 ... Matthew committed in r311469
Relates to a number of issues SAK-22210, SAM-2369 but xalan doesn't appear to be used in jsf and the version in rwiki is old because we were extending a class that's not final. Wrapping that class appears to work out fine and gets those libraries updated for rwiki.