Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

Discussion of the scope for the OSP 2.4 release. Consider that the release is planned for the April 2007 timeframe and the code freeze for the release is on March 15th. List items that you believe are important to include in the upcoming release. Ultimately the scope will be determined by the folks who commit to work on the 2.4 project, the resources available, and the time constraints. Also see the /wiki/spaces/REQ/pages/13648396425

Draft High Level Scope

Each of the items below represents a high-level scope item. These are intended to frame the release and focus our efforts on elaborating requirements that fall into scope, and postponing work on requirements that fall outside the scope. Once requirements are complete, the set of agreed upon requirements will be the detailed scope for the release.

UI rework/refinement. Focus on making the user experience more integrated and cohesive. This will involve assessing current user workflows, reducing clicks, potentially reducing tools, increasing UI consistency between tools, language consistency, etc.

Documentation. Documentation should include a map and description of how all the tools work together, simple 'start here' cookbook type docs, documentation on how to construct interrelating sets of various data structures including forms, matrices, wizards, portfolio templates, styles, and portfolio layouts.

Sample data structures. Include sample interrelating sets of data structures with examples of populated forms, matrices, wizards, portfolio templates, styles, and portfolio layouts for a variety of portfolio purposes - accreditation, self presentation, integrative learning, project portfolios. Include documentation on how the data structures are created and use cases for the interaction of roles in relation to the purpose for each set of data structures.

Improve authoring flexibility. Improve ability to edit and completely delete data structures (matrices, wizards, forms, styles, portfolio layouts) once created and published. Rethink the immutable design of published data structures and when it makes sense to allow changes in them, i.e., should it be possible to add rows or columns to a matrix once it is already in use?

Reports. Complete the reports tool by creating report templates to ship with the application that allow site participants, site organizers, and administrators to aggregate and display data from forms, matrices, wizards, and portfolios across all sites and users to which they have access.

Integration with Goal Management Tool. Make Assignments, Wizards, Matrices and Forms goal aware. Allow easy exposure of data from assignments, wizards, matrices, and forms from all sites in which a user has data for the purpose of association with a single portfolio template.

Forward compatibility. No changes that require difficult migration. The project team is making a commitment to building all migration scripts for a seamless upgrade from 2.2.x.

Create "Builders" for the hard to create xsd, xsl, css, xhtml files. Create "Builders" for the hard to create xsd, xsl, css, xhtml files. In the short term, tools that enable faculty to build their own forms and their own custom presentations are also needed to reduce the bottleneck around programming staff.

  • No labels