User | CM Membership | Sakai Site 1 membership |
---|
User #1 | Enrolled in the enrollment set attached to "Sec1" | Site member with the configured "enrollment" role (usually "Student") |
User #2 | Official instructor in the enrollment set attached to "Sec1" | Site member with the configured "official instructor" role (usually "Instructor") |
User #3 | Member of "Sec1" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #4 | Enrolled in the enrollment set attached to "Sec4" | Not a site member. Sections must be explicitly mapped, otherwise, they do not feed into the site membership list. |
User #5 | Official instructor in the enrollment set attached to "Sec4" | Not a site member. Sections must be explicitly mapped, otherwise, they do not feed into the site membership list. |
User #6 | Member of "Sec2" | Not a site member. Sections must be explicitly mapped, otherwise, they do not feed into the site membership list. |
User #7 | Member of "Sec5" | Not a site member. Sections must be explicitly mapped, otherwise, they do not feed into the site membership list, regardless of equivalencies / cross listings. |
User #8 | Member of "CO1" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #9 | Member of "CO2" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #10 | Member of "CO3" | Not a site member. Canonical course equivalents (called cross listing in the diagram) do not impact memberships. Only course offering equivalencies are considered when determining site memberships. Is this the correct behavior? |
User #11 | Member of "CS1" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #12 | Member of "CS2" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #13 | Member of "CS3" | Site member with the mapped Sakai role (converted from the CM membership role) |
User #14 | Member of "CS4" | Not a site member. The Canonical Course equivalency does not apply. Is this the correct behavior? |