Accessibility WG Teleconference Minutes 11-08-2012 (moved from Nov 1)

Attendees

  • Joe Humbert
  • Scott Williams

Sakai 2.9

Sakai 2.9 Release

  • 2.9.0 was released on November 9th, 2012
  • The release team plans on pushing out a 2.9.1 maintenance release that will focus on merging issues that didn't make it into 2.9.0
    • This release will come out before the Christmas Holiday
    • Any Jira issues that people would like considered for inclusion should already have a someone working on a patch, be patched, but not verified, or be verified and awaiting merge.
      • This issues should be marked with the tag/label "291triage"
      • Issues must be tagged by November 25th.
  • Joe is going to push to get the Critical Tests & Quizzes Jira ticket ( SAM-1295 - Getting issue details... STATUS ) included in the release.
  • The group will need to discuss other issues to push at the next meeting.

Sakai Accessibility Help Documentation

  • Joe proposes that the group take on the task of updating the tool specific help documentation for 2.9 to include accessibility help information
  • Scott and Joe will talk to the respective help documentation people at their universities to learn about the process of creating the help documentation to make the work easier.
  • The decision has been tabled until more members are present.

Sakai 2.9 Accessibility Review

Reviews in Progress

  • Scott and a Michigan student have be investing a great deal of time in the Sakai accessibility review work.  They have posted numerous review on the Sakai 2.9 Accessibility Review (2012) web page.
  • They will continue to go through the high priority tools.

Discuss Escalating Minor issues to Major

  • Due to the fact that any Jira issues marked as "Minor" many never get address, Joe proposed changing significant minor issues into Major issues.

  • Scott proposed that we change the definition of a Minor issue in our review definition to include the fact that no Jira will be submitted if an issue is marked as Minor.

  • Joe suggested the discussion be tabled until the next meeting.

Collaborative Testing

  • Joe and Scott agreed that it is still crucial for the group to collaboratively test the Tests & Quizzes tool.
  • Joe suggested the discussion of testing date be tabled until the next meeting.