...
User Story 9: Different evaluators with different evaluation devices/forms - UMich (Feb 2, 2008)
This user story is for the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program. In this program, students are evaluated by both their faculty mentor and the peer advisor who runs a weekly seminar.
- Student submits matrix cell for evaluation
- Evaluator 1 (peer adviser) fills out peer-advisor-form, which asks about things like the student's attendance and performance in the peer-advisor-led seminar
- Evaluator 2 (faculty mentor role) reads peer advisor evaluation and takes it into account when filling out faculty-mentor-form. The faculty mentor's form covers all aspects of the program, both participation in the seminars (which the faculty mentor knows about through the peer advisor evaluation) and research work done directly under the faculty mentor.
- Peer adviser meets with student to discuss both evaluations
- Only after After this meeting are the peer adviser unlocks the cell, making the two evaluations made available to the student.
User Story 10: Two or More Evaluations Required- No Routing - IU (Feb 15, 2008)
...