Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Page Properties
label
Status
Status
colourYellowBlue
titleIn ProgressSet aside
Stakeholders
OutcomeNo vote
Due date2013/12/19
OwnerUnlicensed user 

...

Original proposal blocked by material objections raised by Leveque, Severance, Theriault and Whyte.  Revised proposal submitted with a request for a formal vote.  Revised proposal opposed by Theriault, Severance and Whyte.  Chair agrees to call a roll call vote if a second PMC member who supports the proposal seconds the motion for a formal roll call vote no later than 19 Dec. 2013.  Otherwise, the proposal will be deemed rejected due to a lack of consensus.

 

No PMC member seconded the motion for a roll call vote.  The proposal has been set aside due to a lack of consensus.  

Background

From: Anthony Whyte <arwhyte@umich.edu>
Date: December 17, 2013 3:25:44 PM EST
To: Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg@gmail.com>
Cc: "sakai-pmc@collab.sakaiproject.org" <sakai-pmc@collab.sakaiproject.org>
Subject: Re: [sakai-pmc] PROPOSAL: svn cleanup

"I now request the PMC chair call a roll call vote so that this can be decided upon since there were PMC members that contributed positively to the discussion and suggested amendments which are reasonable."

The chair acknowledges the request for a formal roll call vote but notes too that responses to the proposal are trending negative: three -1 votes confirmed (Theriault, Severance and Whyte) together with the possible addition of a lingering fourth (Leveque)).  Given this, I request that a PMC member who supports the proposal second the motion for a formal roll call vote.  If a supporting motion is received on or before Thursday, 19 Dec., I will schedule a roll call vote.  If not, the proposal will be set aside due to a lack of consensus on the question.

...