Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

2.7 Exercise

Attendees

  • Nate Angell
  • Michael Korcuska
  • Stephen Marquard
  • Clay Fenlason
  • John Norman
  • Noah Botimer
  • David Goodrum
  • John Lewis
  • Max Whitney

Minutes

  • technical review protocol
  • started by focusing on graduation to maintenance
  • questions for a production deployer
  • 4 categories of questions
  • not driving toward checkboxes, not quite a scorecard
  • general technical items, code maintenance and metrics, production worries, interoperability
  • looked at GB2 as a first pass, to see how onerous
  • used provisional criteria and scorecard to see what could be reused or added to
  • next steps: get PC to take a look and see if they feel reasonable
  • UX on a separate checklist? yes
  • didn't see questions about whether sakai participated in essential Sakai services (e.g. Search)
  • would like to get these things itemized, descriptive rather than necessarily dispositive
  • is this project introducing a new capability which should be supported by other tools?
  • this has become quite Sakai-2 specific so far, or can we carry this through to Sakai 3? May want to fork it on the level of detail.
  • would be an interesting exercise to do for Sakai 3 right now, to understand what the equivalents are on a similar set of principles.

Next Steps